Altogether Now!!........

An appropriate time to re-post my 'remix' of a kids classic:

*Postman Pat theme tune*

Postman pat, Postman pat, Postman pat is a useless twat.
His eyesight must be poor,
despite 3 notes on the door,
he puts my post in the wrong fuckin box!'

God knows how he knows,
how to drive his van.
How can he see the road -
when he can't read letters,

Maaaaybe he'll get it right one day,
wether he knocks *knock, knock*
..rings.. *ring, ring*
I just want MY fuckin letters -through-MY-door
 
Postman Pat, Postman Pat, Postman Pat is a uselss twat,
always out on strike,
but you can't get ur job right,
no wonder royal mail loses millions every year


God knows why you can't
get MY letters to MY door,
It cannot be that hard
when there's signs there to tell you

Maaaaaybe the Polish temp should get the round full time,
he doesn't knock *knock, knock*
..ring.. *ring, ring*
but he gets MY letters -through-MY-door.....
 
Postman Pat, Postman Pat, Postman Pat is a useless twat,
On strike over contracts & wages,
but you're so fuckin lazy,
no wonder you are such a ...really...happy.... man

*music fades to finish*

FUCK OFF HOME YOU WANKERS AND STOP INSULTING MY INTELLIGENCE!!

I didn't think anything would wind me up as much as the lazy fucking Royal Mail today, but I've just got home to see this on Sky News

What a fucking load of bollocks!!......and I don't mean Nick Griffin appearing on Question Time...... I'm talking to the stupid twatting protesters.
By protesting you are insulting me.
You are basically saying that I'm a fucking idiot and cannot make up my own mind as to who I want to vote for.
Look at all the Police there. They could be off solving & preventing real crimes. Instead they are there having to 'control' you bunch of fucking morons.
The Anti-Fascists  lazy fucking bastards don't want Nick Griffin appearing on Question Time.
Why? .......Because the BNP don't have the same beliefs as you? Because, you're scared people will listen and maybe agree with them?

WHO ARE THE FASCISTS NOW?!!

Whatever you think of the BNP, they ARE a POLITICAL PARTY. People vote for them!!
Rather than getting all hot & bothered about what the BNP stand for, you should be asking yourselves WHY PEOPLE ARE VOTING FOR THEM!! Because that is the REAL issue here!!
People are voting for them because they have become so fed-up with the 'main' political parties, with the way in which they have failed to represent the peoples' interests whilst greedily stuffing their pockets with our taxes.
Rather than Ban the BNP, we should allow them to speak and make up our own minds as to what they say. The 'main' Political parties need to hear what the BNP are saying to enable them to re-engage with the ordinary people who have felt no other option but to vote for them.

So to all you protesters at the BBC.....

FUCK OFF HOME YOU WANKERS AND STOP INSULTING MY INTELLIGENCE!!

And this idiot, David Lammy reckons Skinheads will be terrorising the streets tonight because they'll be emboldened by Nick Griffin's appearance on QT...... For the sake of fuck.......

How close is 'dangerously' close?.....

Don't ask David Wilshire, he obviously has NO idea.......

David Wilshire, the Conservative MP who paid more than £100,000 of expenses to his own company, has complained that he works “dangerously close” to working the minimum wage.
It has emerged that Mr Wilshire complained about his MP’s salary and long hours to trainee journalists at a meeting in Westminster this week.


“I work 60 to 70 hours a week some weeks,” he said, according to various reports.


“When you look at what I earn, it comes dangerously close to working out as the minimum wage.”

Really?!
MPs Salary = £65,000 (that's basic - without the expenses!)
Number of weeks (a year) spent at Westminster = 21
21wks x 70hrs = 1470hrs
65000 / 1470 = £44.22 an hour
National Minimum Wage = £5.80

Even if he worked 70hrs every week of the year, his hourly rate would still work out at £17.86
He would have to work 200 hours a week to be close to the minimum wage!!

Yet another fat greedy fucking bastard who has no idea about what life is like for the people that he supposedly represents......

Inevitability........

Shhhh....... It's the 'R' word........

So how much of our money has been spent on this pointless case?

BNP leader Nick Griffin has agreed to ask his party to amend its constitution so it does not discriminate on grounds of race or religion, a court heard.

Although I would agree with the Equality and Human Rights Commission that 'everyone' has to obey the law, was this case really necessary? Even the Judge pointed out the obvious.....

"the judge said no evidence had been presented to suggest many people from ethnic minorities wanted to join the BNP"

Seriously, if you were from an 'ethnic minority' and not born in the UK would you really want to join the BNP? (I'm white & British and I don't want to join the BNP!)
 It seems as though Nick Griffin's claim that this case was brought simply to try and bankrupt the BNP due to the legal bills, may not be too far from the truth(?)......

And then we have this...


What a ridiculous statement to make! Does she even know the true definition of racism/racist?

Jo Brand is a Labour supporter and what she says is important, because it reflects the beliefs of this Labour Govt. They have practically made it impossible for the White Christian majority of this country to celebrate thier religion/ethnicity for fear of 'offending' others and anyone who voices concerns over this is branded a racist.

Another waste of fecking money then.......

Billions spent on 'protecting' our identities, all fucked by a £750 printer from PC World!!

Identity cards will provide an easy and secure way for legal UK residents to prove who they are.

This line comes direct from the Home Office website (click the link & see for yourself!). Note the word that I've highlighted.....

By locking one individual to one identity using their biometrics, the National Identity Service will make it much harder to create false identities

This comes from the DirectGov website. Again, note the highlighted bit....


Now, read this....

Summary of MPs expenses

Some of them understandable, others..... well see for yourself....

CLICK

Fuck me! You just don't get it, do you?!

Un.be.fucking.lievable

MPs have threatened to throw out a report into the expenses scandal by Sir Thomas Legg, who was appointed by the leaders of all three main political parties to review claims, and who will send letters to all members today telling them how much he calculates they have overclaimed in the last five years.

I do not claim to speak for the 'general public', but I'm fairly certain that my feelings/views on the 'Expenses' scandal are shared by many. Which is.....

"YOU ARE/WERE TAKING THE PISS"

I accept that some of you need certain expenses to be able to perform your duties, but expenses for gardening, cleaning, widescreen TVs, toilet seats, porn films & a fecking Duck House, do you really need these to do your job.... NO!

MPs say that Sir Thomas has exceeded his brief by setting an arbitrary annual limit of £1,000 for gardening claims and £2,000 for cleaning. No such limits were in force at the time they lodged their claims, which were approved by the Commons Fees Office.

“On one level, I can understand the reaction, because, remember, they claimed these allowances and expenses against the then existing rules. They did it honestly and fairly. The House of Commons authorities and Fees Office approved what they had done".

WTF?!....
It doesn't matter to me if Sir Legg has exceeded his brief or that what you claimed was acceptable and authorised 2,3 or 4 years ago, what matters is wether it was an honest and fair way to utilise the public's money!

Sir Stuart Bell told the BBC they were examining a basis for a challenge. “If there is a suggestion that Sir Thomas is not abiding by the rules and standards at the time, I think the public would accept that some breach of fairness there is not actually proper for our MPs,”

Oh, SIR Bell(***), you are sooooooooooooo wrong!! I certainly will NOT accept it, as your beloved 'rules and standards at the time', were a complete crock of shit drawn up and ratified by greedy bastard MPs to see how much they could screw the tax-payers, to line their own pockets.

Perhaps a fairer way to sort this out, would be for each MP to reveal to thier constituents what their letter says and let them decide wether they(the MPs) should do what the letter says or challenge it. After all an MP is......

a representative of the voters...

It seems as though many of you have forgotten this and are only representing yourselves..........

UPDATE: So it's okay to take £60,000+ of our money (by what is tantamount to Fraud) as long as you say sorry?!

Wankers

Attention Horror Fans

Paranormal Activity is coming to the UK at the end of November.

If you liked the Blair Witch Project, you'll LOVE this!!!

Is it okay to be racist at the BBC?....

All depends on how you apologise.......

Seeing as I (and millions of others) pay their fucking wages, I would expect the BBC to be unbiased, fair and to some extent, represent the Public's views and opinions. The recent bullshit over the 'Strictly race row', proves just how far from my expectations they really are....

Carol Thatcher was dropped by the BBC earlier this year (after an off-air comment) because of:

the nature of her apology, with the BBC feeling she had missed the point in claiming it had all been a joke.

As far as I'm aware, at the time nobody made a complaint about Thatcher's comment, but over 2000 people complained about the BBC dropping her.

Now we have Anton Du Beke and his 'Paki' comment, who has this excuse:

"During the course of rehearsals Laila and I have exchanged a great deal of banter entirely in jest, and two weeks ago there was an occasion when this term was used between the two of us"

And, according to the BBC it's okay because;

Anton Du Beke has apologised unreservedly to Laila Rouass who has accepted his apology.

Even the Coffin-Dodger says it's all fine!!

Interesting to note, that at this point the BBC has received nearly 500 complaints about Anton's comment......

HaHaHaHa...... No wait... it's not April 1st... is it?..... You mean this is true?

I shit you not......

Tim Nicholson, 41, of Oxford, was made redundant in July 2008 as head of sustainability at Grainger Plc, Didcot.
A judge ruled in March he could use employment equality laws to claim unfair dismissal.

Sounds fairly straight foward..... yeah?

Mr Nicholson, who said his belief in climate change governed his life to the extent that he no longer flies, had said in a written statement that the company's chief executive Rupert Dickinson did not take his concerns about climate change seriously.

Okaaaaay........

...to claim he was unfairly dismissed because of his views on climate change.

Alright, then.....

He was given permission to make his claim under the Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations 2003 that covers "any religion, religious belief, or philosophical belief".

Okay.... WAIT..... YOU WHAT?!...... Climate change a  FUCKING religious/philosophical belief?.... Since when?

Climate Change cannot be a religion/religious belief. For a start, Climate Change is (supposedly) man-made and has nothing to do with super-human controlling powers and/or gods. There's no 'faith' involved and what deity is there to adore or idolise that's connected to Climate Change?......



So that leaves us with philosophical, 'according to philosophy' (by definition). How does philosophy enter into Climate Change? It isn't the pursuit of truth or knowledge of principles, ideologies or wisdom. It doesn't involve reason and/or argument, in seeking the ultimate truth. Climate Change is exactly what it says on the tin.... Changes in the climate (otherwise know as weather). Climate change is about Meteorology, Climatology, etc dealing with facts and figures - statistical data. In other words...... SCIENCE.

Before any Environ-mentalists, accuse me of being a Jeremy Clarkson sympathiser, consider the consequences of this case should it be successful......

Claim by vegetarian retail assistant for constructive dismissal, cause she had to eat her lentils in the staff canteen next to people eating bacon sandwiches.....

Claim by IT technician for unfair dismissal after he was sacked for numerous unauthorised absences when he was off attending religious festivals Star Trek Conventions....

Claim by Vegan Builder for unfair dismissal, after he was sacked for refusing to wear his safety boots (which were made from 'animal products'), in favor of his hemp sandals.....

Then again....... if this case is successful, I'll be able to start watching Porn on my computer at work..........

Picture from motivated photos

Harriet Harman should be let off.....

Harriet Harman is being investigated by police after allegedly leaving the scene of an accident in which she drove into a parked car

Now here's something you won't here me say that often...



Usually I would lauch into a rant about how our MPs are taking the piss with thier 'one rule for us & and another for you' attitude and indeed many of today's papers are featuring the above story with that kind of 'editorial' slant. But, considering my experiences with a similar offence several years ago, I would have to say that Ms Harmen should be let off (at least for the driving without due care & and leaving the scene of an accident offences). Because when I was the victim in a similar incident the Police refused to investigate on the grounds that 'it was not in the Public's interest' and would be a waste of 'Police' time. But, because of her public profile the Police appear to be 'thoroughly' investigating and this may well lead to criminal charges.
Seems as though the 'one rule....etc....' attitude has backfired on this MP - I hope to see more!!!

ROFLMFAO

Update: Biker chap is apparently Gulf War Vet, with 2 Black Belts!!

Nearly fell off me chair laughing......

Chav wanker.....



Thanks to Old Holborn

GET. FUCKING. IN

Yeah, Fuck You..... Fucking Jobsworth!!

I JUST WANT MY FUCKING DRUGS

So, 12 years and billions of pounds into the NHS later and I can't pick up my medication from the Doctors, even though I'm THERE ALREADY, because I live closer to a Pharmacy?
So, I've got to drive home, then walk into town to the Pharmacy. But, the Pharmacy won't take my prescription because it's hand written (even though I was told that this would be okay). So I go home get back in my car and drive to another Pharmacy, but they also won't accept my prescription because I'm not registered with them(?). So, back in the car to the Doctors who accept the prescription. Then when I go to pick it up, they don't actually give me any drugs (even though I can see them on the bloody shelf behind them!), they give me a 'printed' prescription to take to another Pharmacy!!.........
So, all this pissing about and 6 miles of driving to pick up drugs that I could've got from the Medical Centre when I WAS THERE 7 FUCKING DAYS AGO!!!!!!!

Thank you, Labour for this wonderful NHS.....

Blurring the lines between good & bad, for the sake of Consumerism?

So, the Nazis were bad..... Right?
They killed 6million people for being Jewish, countless others for being homosexual or Political opponents.
They killed 3million Poles & (upto) 20million Soviets when trying to expand the German 'Empire(?)' to the East.
They developed an 'Authoritarian' state..... "Ein Volk (one people), Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer (one leader)"  and rapidly became a dictatorship through 'Gleichschaltung'.
So, it was only right that we should go over there and kick their arses when they wouldn't leave Poland alone. (Ironically leaving them to the Russians after WW2).

Saddam Hussien and the Ba'ath Party, they were bad..... Right?
He ordered the deaths of thousands of Politcal opponents.
He was (alledgedly) behind the gassing of thousands of Kurds in the late 80s.

But, The Chinese Communist Party, they're okay..... Right?

"How many died as a result of persecutions and the policies of Mao? Perhaps you care to guess? Many people over the years have attempted to guess. But they have always underestimated. As more data rolled in during the 1980s and 1990s, and specialists have devoted themselves to investigations and estimates, the figures have become ever more reliable. And yet they remain imprecise. What kind of error term are we talking about? It could be as low as 40 million. It could be as high as 100 million or more. In the Great Leap Forward from 1959 to 1961 alone, figures range between 20 million to 75 million. In the period before, 20 million. In the period after, tens of millions more."

Well, if they're making us cheap shit, who cares...... Right?